Home > Legal Aspects > Post-Conviction DNA Analysis

Post-Conviction DNA Analysis

By: Ian Murnaghan BSc (hons), MSc - Updated: 27 Dec 2012 | comments*Discuss
 
Post-conviction Dna Analysis Appeal

Perhaps one of the most emotional and significant legal aspects of DNA applications has been the newfound freedom for those who were released from prison following DNA analysis. For some individuals, however, the post-conviction release has been a bittersweet one given that decades have already been spent behind bars. Still, these cases highlight the value and importance of DNA analysis that occurs after a person has already been convicted of a crime. While many cases still remain 'locked,' post-conviction analysis will hopefully continue through many calls from freedom projects and the relentless urging of family members who are convinced that a person has been wrongly committed of a crime.

Exoneration

Most of the post-conviction DNA analysis has occurred in the United States. Since the late 1980s, there have been more than two hundred people exonerated as a result of DNA evidence. One project titled the Innocence Project focuses on providing aid to prisoners who maintain their innocence and want access to DNA testing or similar types of evidence that they believe support their claims of innocence.

All of the resources, time and money spent have been criticised by some although others cite that if even one innocent person is freed due to DNA evidence, then the effort is well worth it. For those lucky enough to afford an attorney, they are able to obtain adequate legal representation to appeal the conviction based on DNA evidence. There are, however, currently organisations that focus their efforts on bringing forth DNA evidence for convicts who continue to cite their innocence.

Why do Wrongful Convictions Occur?

There are many reasons why innocent people are convicted of crimes. One study suggested that more than three-quarters of the wrongful convictions examined were the result of a false eyewitness identification. In these cases, the testimony was what ultimately resulted in the individual's conviction. Also, more than one third of the cases entailed inaccurate application of non-DNA forensic evidence. For some of these cases, fraudulent or misrepresented evidence was the culprit. Another issue was false confessions or incriminating statements made by a defendant who was unethically pressured by police and investigators. While there are numerous reasons, the end result was still a wrongful conviction. Sadly, the exoneration for some has come only after decades spent behind bars, which no amount of compensation can every adequately recover for the innocent person.

Future of DNA in Criminal Investigations

With the discovery of DNA, we can fortunately work now to prevent innocent people from being wrongly convicted in the first place. We now have accurate, reliable and successful testing at our disposal. Still, we also have to be careful that we are not too quick to assume that a DNA match showing a person was at the crime scene mistakenly implies they are the perpetrator of the crime. In this sense, DNA works as a complement to other forms of evidence to narrow the pool of possible criminals. Overall, however, we are fortunate to have this kind of technology and it will likely help to prevent innocent people from being convicted while also providing a way to perhaps clear innocent men and women who have already been convicted of a crime.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
thats an interesting topic you have chosen ,i should admire for that, thanks for posting
mandy - 16-Sep-11 @ 7:29 AM
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice...
Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • bhad bhabie
    Re: DNA Sequencing
    why is this sooo long and its hard to understand what this is talking about.
    19 October 2018
  • Rhonda
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    My grandfather died in 1959 and I was wondering if you could do dna from an old pipe of his.
    17 October 2018
  • Rhonda
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    Can you take dna from an old pipe. My grandfather died in 1959 and we only have an old pipe.
    17 October 2018
  • Shelley1964
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    I am trying to get citizenship for the UK as my father was born there. However my parents were not married at the time of my birth and my…
    15 October 2018
  • Nadeoui Eden
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    I am 73 years old. My birth father died in 1976 and I know where he is buried. I have been very active in family research, but have no…
    13 October 2018
  • Nadeoui Eden
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    I am 72 years old. My birth father never gave us accurate family information. I know where he is buried. Would it be legal or possible for me…
    13 October 2018
  • ugly lil boy
    Re: DNA Sequencing
    exscuse me my name is mariah and i need my answer for i tell on all of yall.
    12 October 2018
  • b vf
    Re: The Properties of DNA
    you better tell me what the 5 chararistics of dna are \
    12 October 2018
  • Enoch Correa
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    My son died on july and i think that the ashes they give me not belong to my son how can i do to find out that the ashes they give me belongs…
    30 September 2018
  • Suzette Brits
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    My sister reasonly found out that my father was not her farther we did a paternity test which confirmed this. We suspect who the real farther…
    26 September 2018