Home > Legal Aspects > Government Involvement in DNA Technology

Government Involvement in DNA Technology

By: Ian Murnaghan BSc (hons), MSc - Updated: 21 Feb 2013 | comments*Discuss
 
Government Involvement Dna Technology

Government involvement in DNA technology and processes is generally met with mixed reviews. Supporters believe that we need regulation and structure to ensure this type of technology is not misused. Critics believe that government involvement can lead to a loss of personal freedom if it is too excessive.

DNA Analysis and Laboratory Regulation

With laboratories cropping up everywhere to profit from the advancements in DNA technology and testing, the reliability of their results is vital to providing the public and legal system with accurate information. Testing can be used to profile evidence found at the scene of a crime and it can also be collected from suspects in a case and then compared to crime scene evidence. As such, it is mandatory that laboratory testing is reliable and provides a valid result. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. A number of highly publicised cases have brought to light questions about the integrity of laboratories.

In one case involving an FBI laboratory, a technician did not use negative controls during the DNA analysis and she also modified laboratory papers to hide her mistake. A great deal of weighting is attached to DNA evidence, particularly in criminal cases. In this sense, laboratory regulation is important and necessary to ensure that innocent people are protected and that criminals are identified and sentenced appropriately. Currently, there is an important accreditation process for laboratories but suggestions for random checks and increased monitoring could help to improve reliability if they are consistently performed.

DNA Databases and Government Regulation

In the United Kingdom (UK), a database is kept of DNA profiles from people who are thought to pose a risk to society. The criminal justice system uses this database – the largest such database in the world – to identify criminals and find links between evidence found at the scene of a crime and a perpetrator. There has, however, been criticism over the fact that many people in the database were never formally charged or for those who were, not all were found guilty or received jail time. This level of government regulation and interference is not acceptable to many people. However, others support this involvement and cite the need for even more involvement in DNA technology, particularly where it can potentially safeguard the public.

DNA and Illegal Timber Trade

The concerns around illegal timber trade have now prompted government involvement in the industry. DNA technology has provided a way to confirm the source of trees that are imported into the country. With this approach, a genetic profile is established from each kind of tree that is grown in a legal, approved area. Next, this profile is matched to trees that are brought to production mills, which should ideally provide a positive match. If that occurs, the tree is then approved for processing and shipped out of the country.

The controversy over the government's involvement in DNA and related technologies will likely continue for many years to come, particularly as DNA technology becomes more advanced and mainstream. We need to continue expanding our awareness of government involvement to ensure that any interference is ethical and in the best interests of the public while also safeguarding privacy and freedom to a reasonable extent.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • yoks
    Re: DNA Testing for Pets
    my best friend jakey passed away and i wish to adopt another dog through jakes lineage jake was microchipped twice and i still have his…
    20 January 2020
  • Building
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    Why is a building called a building if it’s already built?
    14 January 2020
  • Joe
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    One sunny day joe was in a great mood. Bob saw him from the other side of the room. But little did he know he was a horny bastard. Joe felt…
    13 January 2020
  • Slave Owner
    Re: An Overview of DNA Functions
    I hate Abraham Lincoln I was fine with my Slaves, they would do everything for me and now they are all released, we should kill…
    13 January 2020
  • Lori Holland
    Re: DNA Testing for Pets
    I noticed I have a similar (question)s as others. Can a sample of my deceased dogs poop be tested to determine why she died? I too am not…
    8 January 2020
  • super steve
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    my brother was killed by a doctor prescribing ripiradone tabletts witch caused him to get colon cancer and now he is dead all because a…
    4 January 2020
  • Jeff
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    I would like to know if it is possible to do DNA testing, of a 1916 sample of blood, which was smeared on the front and back covers and…
    4 January 2020
  • Cazzie
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    Hi my son passed away and i have now found his dad his dad is a little bit sceptical if he is even his i have his…
    21 December 2019
  • Rufus
    Re: Using DNA and for Immigration Purposes
    Hi. My biological father is Irish. But I have a different name on my birth certificate. I want to claim my Irish…
    11 December 2019
  • Barry
    Re: An Overview of DNA Functions
    According to all known laws of aviation, there is no way a bee should be able to fly. Its wings are too small to get its fat…
    25 November 2019