Home > Learning More > History of DNA: The Early Days

History of DNA: The Early Days

By: Ian Murnaghan BSc (hons), MSc - Updated: 29 Dec 2012 | comments*Discuss
 
History Dna Family Ancestors Genetics

The history of DNA is quite an interesting one although it has been somewhat riddled with controversy regarding the credit and identification of the key individuals who discovered DNA. The identification of DNA and its structure is one of the most important health, medical and science discoveries of the twentieth century and it is generally noted that the individuals responsible for the discovery of the double helix structure of DNA were Francis Crick and James Watson. However, were it not for Rosalind Franklin, Linus Pauling and Maurice Wilkins, the two men would likely not have made the discovery following the crucial events that preceded their work.

Early Days of DNA

In the early 1900s, a physicist - Henry Bragg - and his son found that they could use X-ray patterns to determine the atomic structure of crystals. Such X-rays would be important later on when Watson and Crick deciphered the structure of DNA. In the 1920s, evidence for the heat-stability of genetic material was found when it was seen that the genetic information in bacteria cells destroyed by heat could be transmitted to live cells.

Following on in the 1940s, more information was found about DNA composition. Chargaff, a biochemist, showed that the quantity of DNA and its bases were different between species. He also found that certain bases correlated to other specific bases for each species.

In 1953, Watson and Crick discovered the molecular structure for DNA. As with many discoveries, the question of who should justly receive credit can be a debatable one. Ultimately, it was the Watson and Crick paper that was published in the journal Nature in 1953 although directors at both the Cavendish and King's College laboratories had suggested to Nature that the paper by Watson and Crick as well as those by Wilkins and finally, Franklin and Gosling, be published in sequence. It was in 1962 that Crick, Watson and Wilkins received the Nobel Prize. Generally, however, when the topic of DNA discovery occurs, it is Watson and Crick who seem to be mentioned but it is important that others who contributed greatly to this important discovery receive recognition as well. Franklin's photo-51 in particular was a major aspect of the discovery of the DNA double helix.

Moving Ahead With DNA

In 1961, Brenner and Crick concluded that collections of nucleotide bases known as codons will point to single amino acids. Five years later, the genetic code became a reality when we learned about the specific codons that determine a specific kind of amino acid. Soon after in 1970, Smith from a reputable medical school in the United States identified the first restriction enzyme. For those who are unfamiliar with the term, restriction enzymes slice DNA at individual spots in a nucleotide sequence. It would be over the next several years that additional restriction enzymes would be identified. In the early 1970s, another important development was the creation of recombinant DNA, which would serve to trigger the growth of a biotechnology industry.

It was in the 1980s and 1990s that DNA testing became of paramount importance for everything from paternity to forensic identification. Today, DNA continues to be a molecule that guides our knowledge in numerous fields and it will continue to play a large role in scientific research. Still, its history is an important part of our understanding today and also allows us to recognise the many individuals who have been integral to developments in DNA.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
This is such a good website! it helped a lot with my history project.
cat - 19-May-11 @ 7:45 PM
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice...
Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • Sanju
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    I want some question about DNA test when a Lady diez in accidente but fathers denied about his paternity
    22 June 2018
  • WRyyyyyyyyyy
    Re: All About DNA and Proteins
    I dont really care about a writing a letter but good article anyways.
    18 June 2018
  • lstvns
    Re: DNA Testing for Pets
    The carpet in my condo is soiled and stained with urine. My tenant denies it is from her dog, however, that is the only dog that has been in…
    12 June 2018
  • Missy
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    I need help I am 38 years old and don't know who my father is but I have a person in mind but he passed away in 09 my mom never told me who…
    8 June 2018
  • GreatBehoover
    Re: Evolution of DNA
    According to the latest large study by Thayer, DNA amongst the largest survey ever done is showing a complete LACK of diversity. Your article is…
    6 June 2018
  • Eva
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    Would you please help me in my family get closure Destiny went over to Hawaii last year to celebrate her 21st birthday and they said that the…
    30 May 2018
  • N/a
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    My brother has a son my brother dead could i be the DNA for my brother
    26 May 2018
  • dTexn
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    My mother passed before I could get her DNA tested. I have some swabs and toothbrushes she used. Can I get her DNA tested from this?
    25 May 2018
  • ExploreDNA
    Re: DNA Testing for Pets
    Judy - Your Question:Hello. I wonder if is possible to identify a deceased animal if I have a sample of the fur and attached skin. I lost my…
    23 May 2018
  • Nam
    Re: How was DNA Discovered?
    Thank you so much for this. Most articles don’t even mention Franklin or wilkin. This is extremely helpful for my research project. I…
    23 May 2018