Home > Learning More > History of DNA: The Early Days

History of DNA: The Early Days

By: Ian Murnaghan BSc (hons), MSc - Updated: 29 Dec 2012 | comments*Discuss
 
History Dna Family Ancestors Genetics

The history of DNA is quite an interesting one although it has been somewhat riddled with controversy regarding the credit and identification of the key individuals who discovered DNA. The identification of DNA and its structure is one of the most important health, medical and science discoveries of the twentieth century and it is generally noted that the individuals responsible for the discovery of the double helix structure of DNA were Francis Crick and James Watson. However, were it not for Rosalind Franklin, Linus Pauling and Maurice Wilkins, the two men would likely not have made the discovery following the crucial events that preceded their work.

Early Days of DNA

In the early 1900s, a physicist - Henry Bragg - and his son found that they could use X-ray patterns to determine the atomic structure of crystals. Such X-rays would be important later on when Watson and Crick deciphered the structure of DNA. In the 1920s, evidence for the heat-stability of genetic material was found when it was seen that the genetic information in bacteria cells destroyed by heat could be transmitted to live cells.

Following on in the 1940s, more information was found about DNA composition. Chargaff, a biochemist, showed that the quantity of DNA and its bases were different between species. He also found that certain bases correlated to other specific bases for each species.

In 1953, Watson and Crick discovered the molecular structure for DNA. As with many discoveries, the question of who should justly receive credit can be a debatable one. Ultimately, it was the Watson and Crick paper that was published in the journal Nature in 1953 although directors at both the Cavendish and King's College laboratories had suggested to Nature that the paper by Watson and Crick as well as those by Wilkins and finally, Franklin and Gosling, be published in sequence. It was in 1962 that Crick, Watson and Wilkins received the Nobel Prize. Generally, however, when the topic of DNA discovery occurs, it is Watson and Crick who seem to be mentioned but it is important that others who contributed greatly to this important discovery receive recognition as well. Franklin's photo-51 in particular was a major aspect of the discovery of the DNA double helix.

Moving Ahead With DNA

In 1961, Brenner and Crick concluded that collections of nucleotide bases known as codons will point to single amino acids. Five years later, the genetic code became a reality when we learned about the specific codons that determine a specific kind of amino acid. Soon after in 1970, Smith from a reputable medical school in the United States identified the first restriction enzyme. For those who are unfamiliar with the term, restriction enzymes slice DNA at individual spots in a nucleotide sequence. It would be over the next several years that additional restriction enzymes would be identified. In the early 1970s, another important development was the creation of recombinant DNA, which would serve to trigger the growth of a biotechnology industry.

It was in the 1980s and 1990s that DNA testing became of paramount importance for everything from paternity to forensic identification. Today, DNA continues to be a molecule that guides our knowledge in numerous fields and it will continue to play a large role in scientific research. Still, its history is an important part of our understanding today and also allows us to recognise the many individuals who have been integral to developments in DNA.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
This is such a good website! it helped a lot with my history project.
cat - 19-May-11 @ 7:45 PM
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice...
Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Latest Comments
  • Chris
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    Hi, my name is Chris Bennett and I am 57 years old. Two years ago my adopted son died in a car crash and now a month ago a man turned up at…
    25 April 2018
  • Jadedjamie
    Re: DNA Testing for Disease
    Can you DNA test for Lyme disease?
    25 April 2018
  • Ton
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    Hello, my sister was adopted when her biological mother gave her up at 5 by my mother and father. Both my parents are now decreased and my…
    25 April 2018
  • ExploreDNA
    Re: Using DNA and for Immigration Purposes
    bb - Your Question:I have 3 sons and 2 are not my husband's only one. Now my husband want me and the kids to join him…
    17 April 2018
  • ExploreDNA
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    Kiyyah - Your Question:Hi I'm 21 I got pregnant last year in February but I don't know who the father is cause it's three possible guy's and…
    11 April 2018
  • Kiyyah
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    Hi I'm 21 I got pregnant last year in February but i don't know who the father is cause it's three possible guy's and one just got killed…
    10 April 2018
  • Aniva
    Re: STR Analysis - Short Tandem Repeat
    Hello, May I know if there would be any difference in the number of STR Loci used to detect DNA Matches, i.e. would the…
    9 April 2018
  • Denise
    Re: DNA Testing for Pets
    Can you dna my dogs ashes to determine breed? I do not think I got the proper cremains back and I'm very angry. I also have clippings of her…
    5 April 2018
  • ExploreDNA
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    Bear - Your Question:My son was born not breathing on the 28th of March. It's now the 31st can a DNA test still be done? I am also though…
    4 April 2018
  • Bear
    Re: DNA Test after Death
    My son was born not breathing on the 28th of March. It's now the 31st can a DNA test still be done? I am also though only person on his death…
    1 April 2018
Further Reading...
Our Most Popular...
Add to my Yahoo!
Add to Google
Stumble this
Add to Twitter
Add To Facebook
RSS feed
You should seek independent professional advice before acting upon any information on the ExploreDNA website. Please read our Disclaimer.